hankyee.com It's me, but digitized for preserved freshness.

25Oct/090

The Girlfriend Experience…

girlfriendexp03So this film confused the shit out of me. I did not realize that this film was cut out of chronological order, which is a rather important detail. It wasn’t until I was through about half the movie that I realized that out. Going into it I thought it was just a film about a escort and merely watching it for the more scandalous stuff, especially considering that real life porn star Sasha Grey stars in it. However this film is light on scandalous and high on artificial wtfs.

Did this scene your watching at the 75 minute mark really happen late in the movie's timeline? Or did it happen early on in the begining at a prelude to shit? This is the conversation you will have in your head as your watch. As such you are left to piece together the storyline as you see eventually see all the pieces. This is a semi cool idea, except that I never really cared too much about any of the characters. The main story is fairly easy to piece together, but once you do it’s such a letdown that it’s not even worth going back and piecing together all the smaller pieces. Pieces that would probably make this film pretty cool, but it’s just not worth it considering that the main characters suck.

But the non-chronological editing is such a cop out for a shitty story. I feel the only reason for it was just to do it. It served not narrative purpose that I could see. Maybe if her memory got fucked up and she was only remembering pieces at a time, but no it’s as if they shot the entire movie and saw that it was goin g to suck, so the confuse people into liking it they got drunk and reedited the entire thing.

As a side note, this film was apparently filed with the RedOne camera, which is cheaper HD camera which is trying to rival the much more expensive digital HD cameras that other films use. The Blu-ray transfer looked really good. RedOne is probably the best part of this entire film.

Skip it and just watch some Sasha Grey porn instead.

*

Filed under: Film - Posted on October 25, 2009 by Hank Yee No Comments
21Oct/090

Land of the Lost…

landofthelost03After my disaster experience with Year One I had low hopes for Land of the Lost, but it surprises. Not redefining or earth shattering, but LOTL has enough laughs to make it worth a rental. The best scenes come early and late, most of them involving Matt Lauer. But outside of those scenes you won’t remember much of this film after a few days. I still contend that Farrell is a better side kick than leading man, but he’s not bad here.

Rent. And Suck It Matt Lauer!

**

Filed under: Film - Posted on October 21, 2009 by Hank Yee No Comments
18Oct/090

Year One…

yearone01So this was supposed to be a comedy, but I didn’t laugh. Fail! Going into the movie I thought it was about cave men, and while Jake Black and Michael Cera are cave men their journeys have them bumping into Jews, Romans, and Cain & Abel. All groups intermingling as if they all existed at the same time. Chilling out as if it were one big fraternity. Now I wasn’t looking for nor expecting historical accuracy, but this just seemed so blatant that I kept pulling me out of the movie experience and nagged at me the entire time.

And Oliva Wilde is barely in it. Double Fail!

Stay away from this one.

*

Filed under: Film - Posted on October 18, 2009 by Hank Yee No Comments
6Sep/090

Butcher & Singer…

Butcher & Singer - Burger, originally uploaded by unbreaded.

This burger was really really good; perfectly cooked and extremely juicy. I just wish it came with more caramelized onions. Mine only had like three big sized onions. Piling it on would have lead to perfection. During the summer the burger was only six bucks, easily the best burger I’ve ever had fewer than ten bucks. Even at its regular price of sixteen bucks it would be well worth it.

Also had the onion soup (not pictured), which was just so so and for ten bucks overpriced.

Filed under: My Thoughts - Posted on September 6, 2009 by Hank Yee No Comments
4Sep/090

Inglourious Basterds…

basterds01I’m undecided on Tarantino. Reservoir Dogs, great. Kill Bill Part 1, also great. Kill Bill Part 2, little boring but still good. Pulp Fiction, good. From Dusk Till Dawn, fun and enjoyable. All those films and so much indecision, it’s almost illogical. His films are always stylized with his signature conversations, but for all his hype he never feels ground breaking to me. Maybe a little bit retro in that he pays homage to whatever genre he is making, or maybe too much retro since I’m sure many of his references go right over people’s heads. Too self indulgent at times? Or cocky enough to say “Fuck the audience; I’m doing what I want here.”

And that brings us to Inglourious Basterds, Tarantino’s war action genre flick. Which is a lot deeper than the advertisements would lead you to believe. It’s not just a gratuitous version of the Dirty Dozen; way more depth and less Pitt than one would think. Brad Pitt really shares the bill with Mélanie Laurent who plays a young Jewish woman living a secret life in Nazi occupied France, in comparison to Pitt who plays the leader of a all Jewish gorilla commando team hell bent on scalping Nazis and shoving a big one up Hitler’s ass.

And stick one to Hitler is what this film is about, the Revenge of the Jews. I guess the Weinsteins’ felt that Middle America would want nothing to with Jew on Nazi violence, because the chosen people completely absent from the American advertisements. But whatever, killing Nazis is always pure gold, it’s the main reason why so many first person shooters are WWII based. And Kill Nazis they do. Oh how they do. It’s bloody, over the top, and unapologetic.
Pitt is great as the commando leader and I’m sure that people will be quoting his lines for years to come. But the real star of this film is Laurent. Her story line is the one that I really cared about. You know how it’s going to end up a third of the way through, but it doesn’t matter you still root for her regardless. And how Pitt and Laurent’s story line entwine is a nice little twist considering the genre.

But as good as all the above is, the film has its share of problems. A good number of the scenes seem to go on and on, you fight a constant battle between boredom and engagement. At 153 minutes parts will so engage you that you will think the film is a third that length, while others will make you swear it’s the second reincarnate of Return of the King. Which is a shame because it really pulls you out of the viewing experience.

Inglourious Basterds is vintage Tarantino for better or worse.

***

Filed under: Film - Posted on September 4, 2009 by Hank Yee No Comments